Simulation of transient fluid–structure interaction in flapping-wing micro aerial vehicles

Downloads

Authors

  • W. Stankiewicz Division of Virtual Engineering, Institute of Applied Mechanics, Poznan University of Technology, Poland 0000-0002-5159-7295
  • T. Krakowski Division of Virtual Engineering, Institute of Applied Mechanics, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
  • K. Foltyński Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland 0009-0000-5010-6194

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate aeroelastic phenomena occurring during airflow around flapping wings of a micro aerial vehicle (MAV) inspired by insect anatomy. A numerical model of the wing and the flow configuration was de-veloped based on an experiment conducted at ESPCI Paris. Transient fluid–structure interaction (FSI) simulations were carried out in the Ansys environment, employing independent solvers for fluid flow (CFD) and structural deformation (FEM), coupled through the System Coupling module. The analysis focused on the role of wing compliance in thrust generation, with particular attention to the effects of flapping frequency and wing stiffness, determined by the thickness of the membrane forming the lifting surface. The results demonstrate a strong dependence of thrust generation on the degree of wing deformation, in good agreement with the experimental findings. These findings highlight the importance of structural flexibility in enhancing aerodynamic performance and provide practical guidelines for the design of efficient flapping-wing micro aerial vehicles.

Keywords:

fluid–structure interactions, FSI, aeroelasticity, CFD, MAV, microdrone, bio-inspired, flapping wings

References


  1. T. Hylton, C. Martin, R. Tun, V. Castelli, The DARPA Nano Air Vehicle Program, 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA, 2012.

  2. D. Faux, O. Thomas, E. Cattan, S. Grondel, Two Modes resonant combined motion for insect wings kinematics reproduction and lift generation, Europhysics Letters, 121, 66001, 2018.

  3. R.J. Wood, Liftoff of a 60mg Flapping-Wing MAV, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1889–1894, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), 2007.

  4. G.C.H.E. De Croon, M.A. Groen, C. De Wagter, B. Remes, R. Ruijsink, B.W. van Oudheusden, Design, aerodynamics and autonomy of the DelFly, Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 7, 2, 025003, 2012.

  5. B. Thiria, R. Godoy-Diana, How wing compliance drives the efficiency of self-propelled flapping flyers, Physical Review E, 82, 1, 015303, 2010.

  6. S.P. Sane, The aerodynamics of insect flight, Journal of Experimental Biology, 206, 23, 4191–4208, 2003.

  7. K. Kawakami, S. Kaneko, G. Hong, H. Miyamoto, S. Yoshimura, Fluid–structure interaction analysis of flexible flapping wing in the Martian environment, Acta Astronautica, 193, 138–151, 2022.

  8. B. Gupta, E. Sihite, A. Ramezani, Modeling and controls of fluid–structure interactions (FSI) in dynamic morphing flight, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13039 (preprint).

  9. D. Drikakis, D. Fung, I.W. Kokkinakis, S.M. Spottswood, K.R. Brouwer, Z.B. Riley, D. Daub, A. Gülhan, High-speed fluid–structure Interaction predictions using a deep learning transformer architecture, Physics of Fluids, 37, 5, 2025.

  10. A. Tiba, T. Dairay, F. De Vuyst, I. Mortazavi, J.-P. Berro Ramirez, Machine-learning enhanced predictors for accelerated convergence of partitioned fluid–structure interaction simulations, Computer Physics Communications, 310, 109522, 2025.

  11. S. Ramananarivo, R. Godoy-Diana, B. Thiria, Rather than resonance, flapping wing flyers may play on aerodynamics to improve performance, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 15, 5964–5969, 2011.

  12. S.A. Combes, T.L. Daniel, Flexural stiffness in insect wings I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation, Journal of Experimental Biology, 206, 17, 2979–2987, 2003.

  13. R. Roszak, P. Posadzy, W. Stankiewicz, M. Morzyński, Fluid–structure interaction for large scale complex geometry and non-linear properties of structure, Archives of Mechanics, 61, 1, 3–27, 2009.

  14. J. Donea, A. Huerta, J-Ph. Ponthot, A. Rodríguez-Ferran, Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian Methods, Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, 2004.

  15. C. Farhat, C. Degand, B. Koobus, M. Lesoinne, Torsional springs for two-dimensional dynamic unstructured fluid meshes, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 163, 1-4, 231–245, 1998.

  16. D.K. Walters, D. Cokljat, A three-equation eddy–viscosity model for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of transitional flow, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 130, 121401, 2008.

  17. D.C. Wilcox, Simulation of transition with a two-equation turbulence model, AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics) Journal, 32, 2, 247–255, 1994.

  18. S.K. Chimakurthi, S. Reuss, M. Tooley, S. Scampoli, ANSYS Workbench system coupling: a state-of-the-art computational framework for analyzing multiphysics problems, Engneering with Computers, 34, 385–411, 2018.

  19. K. Kotecki, H. Hausa, M. Nowak, W. Stankiewicz, R. Roszak, M. Morzyński, Deformation of Curvilinear Meshes for Aeroelastic Analysis, IDIHOM: Industrialization of High-Order Methods-A Top-Down Approach, pp. 125–131. Springer, 2015.

  20. K. Jansen, F. Shakib, T. Hughes, Fast projection algorithm for unstructured meshes, [in:] Computational Nonlinear Mechanics in Aerospace Engineering (A93-12151 02-31), 1992.

  21. F. Bos, Numerical Simulation of Flapping Foil and Wind Aerodynamics: Mesh Deformation Using Radial Basis Functions, PhD thesis, TU Delft, 2009.

  22. U. Burggraf, M. Kuntz, B. Schöning, Implementation of the Chimera Method in the Unstructured DLR Finite Volume Code TAU, New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics II: Contributions to the 11th AG STAB/DGLR Symposium, pp. 93–100, Springer, 1999.

  23. S. Patankar, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, CRC Press, 2018.

  24. R. Courant, K. Friedrichs, H. Lewy, Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik, Mathematische Annalen, 100, 1, 32–74, 1928.